Vocabulary
Study Guide
4.1 What the Exam Is Really Testing Here
The exam is not testing:
-
Equipment sizing
-
Duct or pipe routing
-
Electrical load calculations
-
Code minimum tables
-
Engineering-level design
They are testing whether you can:
-
Select appropriate MEP system types
-
Understand space and coordination implications
-
Evaluate system tradeoffs
-
Integrate MEP with structure, envelope, and program
-
Recognize reasonable vs unreasonable design decisions
Most questions are really asking:
“Given this building type and layout, which system approach makes the most sense?”
4.2 Core Concept (Burn This In)
MEP systems must fit the building — not the other way around.
Good system decisions:
-
Support the program
-
Respect spatial constraints
-
Coordinate with structure and envelope
-
Balance efficiency, flexibility, and cost
The “best” system is the one that fits the context, not the most advanced option.
4.3 Mechanical Systems (HVAC) — Design-Level Thinking
You should recognize system categories, not components.
Common system concepts:
-
Centralized vs decentralized systems
-
All-air vs air-and-water systems
-
Zoned vs single-zone distribution
Design-level implications:
-
Space for equipment and shafts
-
Floor-to-floor height impacts
-
Flexibility for future change
-
Maintenance access
Exam pattern:
Systems that improve flexibility usually increase space or cost.
4.4 HVAC Zoning (Very High-Yield)
Zoning decisions affect:
-
Energy performance
-
Occupant comfort
-
Control flexibility
-
Coordination complexity
They expect you to:
-
Separate zones by orientation, use, or load
-
Avoid over-zoning simple buildings
-
Recognize when zoning is necessary
Over-zoning = higher cost and complexity.
4.5 Electrical Systems — Conceptual Planning
PPD-level electrical considerations include:
-
Service size implications (conceptual)
-
Equipment room location
-
Vertical distribution strategy
-
Redundancy needs for critical programs
You are not expected to:
-
Calculate loads
-
Size transformers
-
Design panel layouts
They are testing whether electrical needs match the program intensity.
4.6 Plumbing Systems — Stacking & Distribution Logic
Plumbing planning relies on:
-
Vertical stacking of wet areas
-
Efficient waste and vent routing
-
Core alignment
Correct answers often:
-
Stack restrooms and kitchens
-
Minimize long horizontal runs
-
Align plumbing with structure
Exam logic:
Simple plumbing layouts reduce cost and risk.
4.7 System Coordination & Space Planning
MEP systems compete for:
-
Ceiling plenums
-
Shafts
-
Equipment rooms
-
Roof space
PPD decisions must acknowledge:
-
Structural depth
-
Envelope thickness
-
Architectural ceiling goals
Ignoring system space is a common exam trap.
4.8 Program Intensity & System Selection
They often use program type to signal system demand:
-
Offices → moderate systems
-
Labs / healthcare → high system complexity
-
Residential → repetitive, stacked systems
Correct answers reflect appropriate system complexity — not excess.
4.9 Typical PPD MEP Scenarios
Scenario A: Tight Floor-to-Floor Heights
Correct thinking:
-
Shallow duct systems
-
Integrated structure + MEP planning
Incorrect thinking:
-
Deep systems with no spatial coordination
Scenario B: Flexible Tenant Fit-Outs
Correct thinking:
-
Decentralized or zoned systems
-
Allowing future change
Incorrect thinking:
-
Highly rigid centralized layouts
Scenario C: Budget-Constrained Project
Correct thinking:
-
Simple, proven systems
-
Minimize complexity
Incorrect thinking:
-
Advanced systems without justification
4.10 What the Exam Does Not Expect Here
You are not expected to:
-
Size equipment
-
Design duct layouts
-
Calculate energy use
-
Choose manufacturers
-
Perform engineering analysis
If your solution sounds like PPD + engineering drawings, it’s beyond scope.
4.11 Common PPD Traps
-
Selecting systems with no space
-
Over-engineering simple buildings
-
Ignoring coordination with structure
-
Assuming systems can “fit later”
-
Confusing flexibility with efficiency
4.12 MEP Decision Filter (Exam Day)
When you’re stuck, ask:
-
Does the system fit the program?
-
Is the spatial impact realistic?
-
Does it allow appropriate zoning?
-
Is it coordinated with structure and envelope?
-
Is the complexity justified?
Correct answers usually:
-
Feel practical
-
Balance performance and simplicity
-
Respect coordination limits
-
Avoid extremes
